Dark side of technology Essay

The nature of these machines makes it possible for contrast against ordinary soulfulnesss. Ordinary persons who may turn out a predisposition towards certain tendencies could be found out and victimised horizontal though they deal yet to consign a crime they have the thinker pattern of a criminal. This is the dark align of technology.More research is needed to instruct whether or non there atomic number 18 differences betwixt criminals and ordinary persons.There is inhabit for these tests to be manipulated by either the quest or the defence. Which ever team pays for the tests support get the results that they so desire.Over sensibility of the machinery needs to be controlled for in the tests in order for their reliability to be increased, and their public utility enhanced.More research needs to be done to determine if there ar genuine differences between the brains of criminals and ordinary persons.If the tests argon genuinely able to discover differences between criminals and ordinary persons then maybe abnormalities back end be controlled for before criminal behavior is expressed.DeregowskiDepth Cue- Depth inspires are (hints, guides, cues) which exit discipline about the spatial (positioning congeneric to each other) relationships among objects ( tierce dimensional) in a epitome (two dimensional).Familiar Size- The cue whereby objects, which are pass on away in the externalise, are emaciated smaller than objects of the same size which are closer.Overlap Cue- The effect of a nigher object obscuring parts of a more than distant object.Perspective- This is given by the crossway of lines depicting edges which are parallel in the real world, but which appear to get in together as they move into the keep e.g. a railway track.A person using a depth cue will extract a all told divers(prenominal) meaning from a picture than will a person who is not using such pictures.Various drawings of an elephant, an antelope, a person, a tree , a road, virtually hills and a flying bird were shown.Empirical proveThe tests are empirical beca practice session numeric informationrmation was collected. How many persons make different responses e.t.cThese tests involved showing pictures and asking questions. What do you suck?What is the man doing?Which is nearer the antelope or the elephant?methodological analysisThe questions were asked in the subjects, native language. This means the results were not affected by confusion resulting from the use of the inter catch up withers language or from translations. They understood hardly what they were being asked.There was a potential difference problem with classification. If questions were answered correctly according to westbound standards it was automatically assumed that they were three dimensional perceivers. This could have impacted upon the results.The tests may not have been measuring cultural differences as noted but instead, educational and cordial levels. Evidence for this is provided by persons of better educational and affable levels performing better on the tests. Remember children have better approach shot to western culture and education than do adults. Additionally higher educational and social levels provide persons with access to western culture.Deregowski reviewed Hudsons work and tramp forward some different opinions. This means the results could have been a return of interpretation.The study includes information from different time periods. The results may have been as a result of this time elapse. For e.g. the info collected from Zambian school children-information was presented from twain 1960 and 1972. There culture and circumstances may have changed tremendously during the time elapse.Adults and children were differentiated. because a comparison could have been made to take into account changes in culture. abide by Hudson found that children had higher rates of three dimensional perception than did adults. note-Deregowsk i found that both adults and children had difficulties making three dimensional perceptionsbionomic ValidityThe Subjects may have been put in artificial categories which were a consequence of the test-three dimensional and two dimensional perceivers.Persons are not normally required to view pictures under these conditions (circumstances) as existed during the study.The tests may have been picking up differences in educational and social levels and not culture as was suggested.